Dinner Table Don'ts

Dinner Table Don'ts

Share this post

Dinner Table Don'ts
Dinner Table Don'ts
The Case for Christian Nationalism: Asserting God's Authority over the State

The Case for Christian Nationalism: Asserting God's Authority over the State

Overview of Chapter Two of Stephen Wolfe's polemic in favour of Christian Nationalism

Peter Thurley's avatar
Peter Thurley
Jan 15, 2023
∙ Paid

Share this post

Dinner Table Don'ts
Dinner Table Don'ts
The Case for Christian Nationalism: Asserting God's Authority over the State
Share

While the first two pieces of this series are available for all subscribers, what follows will initially be available only to paid subscribers. Until January 31, 2023, get 20% off your monthly rate for the first year, and receive exclusive access to all my posts on Christian Nationalism!

Get 20% off for 1 year

The second chapter, which deals with the nature of postlapsarian (after-the-Fall) Man, feels, in many ways, to be a stop-gap chapter between the basis of the author’s project and his desired ends. Because this is, despite his protestations, largely a piece of political theology based on his reading of Reformed theologians from the 16th-18th centuries, there is very little trace of even the Enlightenment political theorists. Perhaps that will change as we move out of the theology-heavy sections, but I’m not optimistic. In what follows, I’ll highlight a couple of Wolfe’s arguments, in hopes of highlighting the fact that this is, first and foremost, a project aimed at asserting religious authority over secular life.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Peter Thurley
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share